Doctoral students who choose to study measures to be used as a research methodology for their thesis, depending on the academic environment in which they work and the relatively conservative, they might have to translate the research paradigm needs or requirements of the standard one. This article refers to any situation, while all actions those researchers consider the same challenges when writing for publication. I work in and around the problems inherent with a discussion of the methodology in academic silos for years I can easily say it is not difficult to overcome what others might consider a split or gap between the AR and the rest of the research community. The results of making this bridge to a wider acceptance and respect for the AR in all areas and, more important than the position of the AR, increased use of best practices from our work to develop in our industry or academic context. Bridging the gap requires that you understand both sides, so you can work a solid communication between them.
Seven research concept that is widely used in scientific journals that strictly as a basis for all abstracts. Its use makes navigating through the results of others with ease and promote the various results in different groups. The seven concepts are: purpose, scope (which means that the size of the project), methodology, findings, conclusions, limitations, and contributions. It is a preconceived notion of this writer that if all the investigators adhered to the seven concepts that we will find a lot of literature is more easily digested, and we will find ourselves in a position to more good contrast and compare our work with others. This is a contrast and comparison that intellectual discussions about our work and others in our field permits. Whatever the context, however, candidates have a logic all the elements to discuss their dissertation work to defend and understand.